চলতি নোটিসঃ
রাজবাড়ী সার্কেল | একই সুতোয় গাঁথা প্রাণ | সার্কেল ফাউন্ডেশন দিচ্ছে সুবিধাবঞ্চিত শিক্ষার্থীদের জন্য মাত্র এক টাকায় খাতা, এক টাকায় কলম [বিস্তারিত জানতে ক্লিক করুন]। রাজবাড়ী সার্কেল আয়োজিত রাজবাড়ী জেলায় কর্মরত সকল সাংবাদিকের সম্মানে মানুষের জন্য সাংবাদিকতা অ্যাওয়ার্ড ২০২২। অ্যাওয়ার্ড প্রদান: ১৪ জুলাই ২০২২, বৃহস্পতিবার, বিকাল ৪ ঘটিকা। স্থান: রাজবাড়ী পৌরসভা রজনীগন্ধা অ‌ডিট‌রিয়াম।…[বিস্তারিত জানতে ক্লিক করুন]
  • 01920671314
  • info@rajbaricircle.com
  • ১২:৫৬ পূর্বাহ্ন | মঙ্গল | ২৭ সেপ্টেম্বর ২০২২
Theory Three: Enhanced therapist association will be associated with improved introject affiliation for the DBT

Theory Three: Enhanced therapist association will be associated with improved introject affiliation for the DBT

So you can sample the third hypothesis i used formula 2 to examine new relationship ranging from identified specialist association and you may introject affiliation round the weeks in the cures and you may treatment class. Our very own no. 1 details incorporated: 1) the new dimensional studies from counselor association that have introject association and you can dos) the brand new SASB cluster critiques off affiliative decisions along with counselor affirm with introject mind-affirm, specialist active like which have introject effective mind-love, and you will specialist include which have introject care about-cover. The fresh new four HLM analyses exploring the relationship anywhere between these types of parameters from inside the DBT, when ranked in one testing months, were not tall nor was in fact the fresh independent ramifications of counselor affiliation into introject association.

DBT clients who claimed better analysis of therapist productive love reported a great deal more introject care about-love regarding the following the research several months, B = 0

Using the same variables, we ran a series of four lagged HLM analyses examining the association between ratings of the therapist behavior and next period ratings of introject. Dimensional ratings of therapist affiliation on next period introject affiliation in DBT were not significant nor were the independent effects of therapist affiliation on next period introject affiliation. Analysis of the lagged association between the SASB clusters revealed two significant findings. 23, SE = 0.08, t(97) = 2.99, p < 0.00, CI = 0.08, 0.39. Similarly DBT patients who reported greater ratings of therapist protect reported an increase in introject self-protect in the following assessment period, B = 0.18, SE = 0.09, t(97) = 2.11, p < 0.04, CI = 0.01, 0.35. Results were not significant for an increased association between therapist affirm and next period ratings of introject self-affirm in DBT.

In comparison to CTBE, DBT patients reported a fabswingers dating website stronger, positive association between therapist affirm and next period ratings of introject self-affirm, B = -0.37, SE = 0.21, t(96) = -2.25, p < 0.03, CI = -0.69, -0.04. In contrast, CTBE patients reported a tendency for the opposite pattern where higher ratings of therapist affirm predicted less introject self-affirm in the following assessment period. DBT patients also reported a stronger, more positive association between therapist active love and next period ratings of introject self-love compared to CTBE, B = -0.26, SE = 0.11, t(97) = -2.32, p < 0.03, CI = -0.47, -0.04 (See Figure 5 ). Results were not significant when comparing treatment differences in the lagged association between therapist protect and introject self-protect or dimensional ratings of therapist affiliation and introject affiliation.

Hypothesis Five: Improved counselor association would-be from the less frequent NSSI within the DBT

The fourth hypothesis examined the association between SASB rated therapist affiliation and NSSI during DBT. Poisson HLM models showed no significant effect for the dimensional rating of therapist affiliation on NSSI apart from treatment. In the DBT condition, patients who perceived their therapists as more affiliative also reported less NSSI, B = -0.87, SE = 0.45, z = -1.94, p < 0.05, regardless of time in treatment. In comparison to CTBE, DBT therapists reported a significantly greater association between increased therapist affiliation and less NSSI, B = 0.01, SE = 0.00, z = 2.36, p < 0.02.

Supplementary analyses examined the specific SASB therapist clusters contributing to this overall effect. Analyses resulted in three significant effects where higher levels of therapist affirm, B = -0.01, SE = 0.00, z = -2.37, p < 0.05, higher levels of therapist active love, B = -0.01, SE = 0.00, z = -2.56, p < 0.05, and higher levels of therapist protect, B = -0.01, SE = 0.00, z = -2.70, p < 0.05, were associated with fewer occurrences of NSSI for DBT patients. In comparison to CTBE, results showed a significant treatment interaction for therapist affirm and therapist protect where DBT patients reported a stronger association between increased affirmation and protection with decreased NSSI. In contrast, CTBE showed the opposite pattern where patients who reported higher levels of therapist affirm showed more frequent NSSI while therapist protect showed little association with NSSI. Lagged analyses examining the order of change between patient perception of therapist behavior and next period ratings of NSSI were not significant.

চলতি ইভেন্ট

অ্যাওয়ার্ড প্রদান: ১৪ জুলাই ২০২২, বৃহস্পতিবার, বিকাল ৪ ঘটিকা, স্থান: রাজবাড়ী পৌরসভা রজনীগন্ধা অ‌ডিট‌রিয়াম